NETOBSERV-268 frontend code styling#541
NETOBSERV-268 frontend code styling#541openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 10 commits intonetobserv:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #541 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 56.56% 56.43% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 173 183 +10
Lines 9042 9079 +37
Branches 1183 1182 -1
==========================================
+ Hits 5115 5124 +9
- Misses 3561 3589 +28
Partials 366 366
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
Sorry @jotak I had other changes in my list |
stleerh
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just one minor comment. Everything else /lgtm.
| margin-top: 0 !important; | ||
| margin-right: 0 !important; | ||
| margin-bottom: 0 !important; | ||
| margin-left: 0 !important; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
margin:0 !important; is the shortcut for lines 244-247 so you can remove lines 244-247.
|
@jpinsonneau LGTM, just leaving you checking the failing cypress test and Steven's comment |
not sure what was causing the issue. Let's see if it happens again |
|
@memodi any idea on what could cause the cypress error ? |
|
Seems like 1caa117 fixed it 😸 |
glad, you were able to figure this out. I'd not have idea. Perhaps we should enable video recording and archiving images from failed runs to the build logs? |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval. This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
cc @Amoghrd this has been merged, were there any regression test impact? |
|
Havent tested it. Will run regression. Was waiting for a reply on JIRA |
|
Regression is passing cypress-tests#664 with some flakes. All passed on manual rerun. But table_queryopts and netflow_table tests required changes; Made here: openshift-tests-private#17547 |
* prettier sort imports * sort imports + constants naming * flex + flexitem * TextContent and Text usage * interfaces for props * move helpers + voronoi as component * split dropdowns / panels when possible * fixes * removed unecessary CSS * fix voronoi container
* prettier sort imports * sort imports + constants naming * flex + flexitem * TextContent and Text usage * interfaces for props * move helpers + voronoi as component * split dropdowns / panels when possible * fixes * removed unecessary CSS * fix voronoi container
Description
Dependencies
n/a
Checklist
If you are not familiar with our processes or don't know what to answer in the list below, let us know in a comment: the maintainers will take care of that.